Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9678 14
Original file (NR9678 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO9678-14
19 November 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy
uj
Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 812/0334 of
29 Oct 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed
enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced
to E-6/AWOl from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on ,
19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

 

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached.as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No.NRO9678-14

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWO1 from the March 2012 Navy-
wide advancement examination with an effective date of 16 December
2042 and a lime In kate date of i July 2022.

b. Petitioner's 1° Air Medal Strike/Flight Award is from period
1 January 2010 to 30 March 2010. ,

c. Petitioners 2" Air Medal Strike/Flight Award is from period
1 April 2010 to 11 May 2010.

d.. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances from the
effective date forward.

Note: The change in the effective date of advancement to E-6 may also
impact on Petitioner’s E-7 advancement opportunity. If Petitioner was
eligible for, but did not take an E-7 examination because the above
change had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to
remediate that missed opportunity. Petitioner should take the next
available E-7 advancement examination and compare the Final Multiple
Score (FMS) received on that examination with the FMS that was
required for the “missed” exanination. If the score received meets or
exceeds the score that was previously required for Board eligibility,
Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement
to E-7 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on
the “missed” examination cycle. A DD Form 14%, a command
endorsement/recommendation, and a copy of this letter must be included
with the request. The Board will determine whether the request wili

be approved.

e. .A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

 

5 Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
Docket No.NRO9678-14

(32 Code ot Federal Regulations, Section 723.6\e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.
: jf Ve,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0167 14

    Original file (NR0167 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3376 14

    Original file (NR3376 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/085 of 13 Mar 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1089 14

    Original file (NR1089 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/EN3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5654 14

    Original file (NR5654 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that petitioner wag advanced to E-4 from the February 2013 Navy-wide advancement 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zealman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14

    Original file (NR0500 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2940 14

    Original file (NR2940 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR882 14

    Original file (NR882 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed | enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to B-4/¥YN3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6491 14

    Original file (NR6491 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June 2010 to 15 June 2011 {copy at Tab A) to change the rate from YN3 (pay grade B-4) to YN2 (pay grade E-5). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8230 14

    Original file (NR8230 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant te the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to shew that Petitionsr advanced to E-4/AWS3 via the Advanced Technical Field program. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11050 14

    Original file (NR11050 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR11050-14 30 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO